Your irresistible truth and how to tell it.

Strange bedfellows. When shared values are a bad thing.

How can shared values be a bad thing?

Shared values are usually the basis for a match made in heaven. But it’s not so good if your organisation shares values with its nemesis. This happens a lot, most often when an organisation chooses to use single-word values.

I’m not a fan of single-word values. So many of them are straight out of Central Casting – innovation, collaboration, creativity, transparency, agility etc. Your heart sinks when you read them; another company going through the motions.

Your values are the genes that determine your culture. They should be uniquely meaningful. Most single words aren’t. Most single words are uncontroversial, bland, anodyne. They’re safe words that people write on sticky notes in brand strategy workshops. You can’t argue with them. And if you can’t argue with a value it’s probably a hygiene factor. Any business that doesn’t operate with integrity, any business that doesn’t do innovation, any business you can’t trust, any business that doesn’t embrace diversity, is going to find itself in trouble sooner or later.

It’s hard for a value to be uniquely meaningful if it comes as standard in all organisations. And this happens a lot with single-word values.

Occasionally, a single-word value jumps out at you. It’s not a usual suspect. It’s barbed. It’s quirky. Someone has clearly put some thought into it. It means something. It’s authentic. For example, I want to know more when Qualtrics says that one of its values is ‘scrappy‘.

Control, Magic, and Solidarity are the values of one of my clients – who shall remain nameless. We arrived at these values out of conversations with staff and customers. They’re interesting in isolation. They’re compelling in combination.

I use single words – Access, Adventure, Mutuality – as shorthand for the values I bring to my consultancy work. The longhand versions are better, and I always lead with these, but I made sure that the single words are not your usual suspects.

So there are exceptions. But you nearly always make life harder with single-word values.

You can qualify or explain a single-word value in a way that makes it mean something unique to your organisation. And your values can be different in combination even if they’re common or garden values in isolation.

But, if uniquely meaningful is the goal, choosing bland, single-word values as your starting point is a self-inflicted handicap. They are so broad and generic that you have to work hard to make them mean what you want them to mean for your organisation.

And you’ll inevitably share them with other organisations. Indeed, you might share values with organisations from which you’d rather distance yourself.

There are some cautionary examples of unfortunate shared values below. Some of these you really couldn’t make up.

Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Patagonia" in the lefthand circle. "Shell" in the righthand circle. "Integrity" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Joined and separated by a common language."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Red Cross" in the lefthand circle. "General Dynamics" in the righthand circle. "Humanity" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Part of the solution meets part of the problem."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Health Education England (HEE)" in the lefthand circle. "British American Tobacco (BAT)" in the righthand circle. "Responsible" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "An accusation from one. An admission of guilt from the other?"
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Obama Foundation" in the lefthand circle. "Koch Industries" in the righthand circle. "Humility" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Nothing to boast about."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Climate Works" in the lefthand circle. "Pfizer" in the righthand circle. "Equity" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Fairly different. But similarly fair."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Amnesty International" in the lefthand circle. "Metropolitan Police" in the righthand circle. "Respect" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Mutual respect but no love lost."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF)" in the lefthand circle. "Rio Tinto" in the righthand circle. "Courage" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Mettle meets metal."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "St John Ambulance" in the lefthand circle. "National Security Agency (NSA)" in the righthand circle. "Accountability" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Looking out for and listening into."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Church of England" in the lefthand circle. "Intel" in the righthand circle. "Inclusion" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Intel inside. Seeking sanctuary perhaps."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "The Quakers" in the lefthand circle. "Salesforce" in the righthand circle. "Equality" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Equality as a service."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "BBC" in the lefthand circle. "Haribo" in the righthand circle. "Trust" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "You can count on lots of sweeties."
Shared values Venn diagram. Two intersecting circles. "Earth Justice" in the lefthand circle. "Goldman Sachs" in the righthand circle. "Partnership" in the overlap area. Text in the footer says, "Huge bonus example."

Thank for reading. If you liked this, you might also find these posts interesting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.